Finals, 1/6: Mariangela, Evgeni & Di
Just taking a break from Garden & Gun magazine thoughtfully left in my hotel room.
As I’m enjoying the finals in the hall, I don’t feel compelled to dash off and peck in my instantaneous impressions like some stringer. But after sleeping on it, a few brief thoughts.
It’s a shame these things are juried, since, as I’ve said before, it’s a bit like being at the Westminster Kennel Club and choosing between a St Bernard and a beagle…
All the finalists are terrific, interesting pianists whose colorful personalities harmonize with those of the composers whose music they play. This is, of course, The Cliburn: the adrenaline kick that comes with advancing to the finals really is something. And the added dimension of playing concerti — which really is a different animal from solo playing — is extra special for all. Remember: Every concerto being played here was first played by the guy who wrote it, and without exception, Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, Rachmaninoff and Prokofiev were all thrilled beyond words to unveil these magnificent pieces. That thrill never fades. As I often say, if you’re a pianist, and an orchestra calls, there’s no need to think about it. The answer is always: YES. Combine that with being a Cliburn finalist, and being intensely focused, superbly well-practiced, young and at the top of your game, not to mention playing with James Conlon and the Fort Worth Symphony (probably the best piano concerto-playing orchestra on earth), and every performance is filled with specialness.
Mariangela gamely played her final recital: Bach Italian concerto, Chopin Rondo in Eb, Ravel Gaspard de la Nuit, and Shostakovich prelude & fugue in Db. The Bach is almost like one of his Vivaldi or Marcello transcriptions — wants to be played with orchestral grandeur, almost as if it actually were a transcription And on a big modern Hamburg, why not? She didn’t go all “Baroque performance practice scholar” on us, but seemed to take a more harpsichord-y view, with tiered dynamics feeling a bit flat. This is music that has real smiles, and tears (in the slow movement). The Chopin rondo you pretty much only hear if you buy the boxed set of complete works of Chopin, and even then, you might have stepped out when that particular track was playing. Well, what a wonderful, effervescent, youthful piece it is. Great choice. Godowsky used to play it, and made his own really interesting re-arrangement of it (but nobody plays that anymore). Kudos to Mariangela for bringing it, and playing so beautifully. The Ravel, on the other hand, has become a competition staple. A lot of notes; sometimes, you play the percentages… The others (Di Wu and Haochen Zhang) will end their programs with Gaspard, and it does end with a quiet “fade to black.” A bright and fast closer (the big, noisy Shostakovich qualifies) is a terrific idea — it worked like an encore, as Ken said. Overall, I think Mariangela’s enthusiasm is one of her best assets. Hope she’ll let it show more in the Beethoven and Prokofiev — she deserves to have an insanely great time, and has a lot to look forward to with those wonderful pieces. She’ll rock with Prokofiev.
Usually when I hear someone flutter through the Chopin delicately, I want to shout: “Hey: Pansy! Grow a pair!” Well, in terms of cojones, Evgeni Bozhanov’s Chopin overflowed with buckets of testosterone. As I was watching, I kept thinking of this famous cartoon (click for bigger image):
Look familiar? This might not have been your grandmother’s Chopin, but it was unforgettable and original. Very much in the manner of a big, flamboyant personality like Liszt deciding to “own Chopin” for a set. Maybe not what Chopin expected, but… At times, I thought Evgeni gave one of the best performances of the piece I’d ever heard. Moments of real fire and beauty, and some gorgeously shaped sound. The third movement was more like a Ducati, racing in overdrive, with bits and pieces cracking and falling off, and some patches of “road jelly” left behind…. I see many hotly divided opinions in the blogs, the majority reacting pretty negatively. Well, I thought he was sensational, in all senses. Thrilling in many ways. What a creative fellow. Don’t you wonder what he’ll think in twenty years when he looks back at this video, with more contorted, histrionic faces than Stan Laurel? And those theatrical hand gestures that David Copperfield or pirate Jack Sparrow would envy… With a little face paint, he’d give Gene Simmons a run for his money. Most folks seem to think all the “schtick” was more than a little distracting. C’mon. You have to admit, it’s a gas to watch and utterly unlike anyone else. And I’ll bet you won’t ever forget it. Neither will the judges, whose reactions will likely be pretty mixed. Why, if Kristian Zimerman were here, he’d probably … [finish the sentence please.]
Di Wu played Beethoven #2 in Bb. Face it, this is nobody’s favorite concerto. (Go ahead, bloglodytes, rant about how this one actually is your fave…!) But Di did a great job of making it her favorite for half an hour. Unfortunately… well, how would you like to follow the outrageous Evgeni/Chopin rock-n-roll gig at such a late hour with the least of the Beethoven concertos? She played brilliantly, full of all the right energy. Some of the teeny, tiny, velvety soft lines were disarming — vanishingly quiet — and really made the room listen. I’d forgotten the effect of these, and loved what she did. The rondo was bright and bubbly. She was winsome, feisty, true to the spirit of the piece, and really had fun. I know, blog-folk weren’t all wowed, but I have to think that much of the reaction has to do with the limitations of the piece itself. I mean, if she had said “Oh yeah, Evgeni? Well, you can eat it, because here comes my Totentanz!” Oops, sorry, Totentanz isn’t a classical concerto. When I was 17 I ripped through the Totentanz for a New Jersey Symphony competition. (I remember Earl Wild saying “What do you want to do that for?”). It crashed and burned, and didn’t survive the screening round. Anyway, one’s repertoire choices do make a difference. Maybe Mendelssohn, or Schumann would have fared better? Nonetheless, I’m curious to hear her Rachmaninoff.
And I’m very much looking forward to hearing all of these terrific people play more pieces.
What a fabulous time!
— Mike Hawley





June 4th, 2009 at 10:21 am
Very disappointingly, the archived rehearsal sessions (without orchestra) have been removed. They had been archived under “Offstage”.
Why were they taken down, and to whom can one complain?
June 4th, 2009 at 11:10 am
Mike, I agree with you about the delicous Bulgarian. Last night I thought he was playing the Chopin as if he had a bus to catch…but on reflection it has stayed with me , and I LOVE watching him. I feel as if he really would like to get up and conduct his own playing. Perhaps he will end up a conductor one day or at the very least, do it from the piano and play the Brahms B flat at the same time!
June 4th, 2009 at 11:54 am
I don’t quite understand the fascination and lovefest with Vocatelli. I find her playing to be quite ordinary at best–even after listening to every performance of her’s so far. Her recital yesterday, to me was nothing more than an ordinary–I would expect more from a Cliburn finalist than that. Student like Italian Concerto performance, standard (if not a bit shaky) performance of Chopin, ordinary colors in Ondine andGibet, and nothing more than acceptable technique in Scarbo, and a highly unstable and rushed Shoshtakovich fugue.
If I was looking for sheer sublime artistry, Lifits was far beyond anything I’ve heard from Vocatelli. If I was looking for the enormity of talent and musical vision, Bozhanov leaves her in the dust (despite a rushed 3rd movement of the Chopin yesterday). If I was looking for sensitivity, Nobu is extraordinary. All the right notes–Haochen.
Am I missing something? I have a hard time seeing how Vocatelli would advance to the finals of a much lesser competition.
Enlighten me folks!
June 4th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Mike, great write up on the performances last night. I loved Mariangela and Evgeni the best.
June 4th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Mike, you are very funny, but wise too. I love your account of last evening!
June 4th, 2009 at 1:03 pm
Mike, i am so enjoying when i read your article, it is so interesting and knowledgeable.love it. I also like the carton you post, match well.
the interesting thing was, i did think about Zimmerman at that time, and have to listen one more time his interpretation before i go to sleep:).
June 4th, 2009 at 1:28 pm
ack! so I am a “bloglodyte” if the Beethoven piece was my favorite!?! I am really a Bach/Beethoven kind of guy, so maybe it is just interpreter bias in thinking that Di Wu outperformed the flashy onslaught of Evgeni.
Also I wish I could have seen the conductor during the performance The piano lid directly blocked my view of Conlon.
Thanks for the great post, especially the ancient newspaper pictures! Too funny.
June 4th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Mike, I had to miss last night’s performances, so caught up form the archives. Then I read the blog and your responses. It was delicious!!! You write as well as you play. . .yes. . .that’s a compliment!!!
June 4th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
@Cliburn follower: I don’t know who Vocatelli is, but I can tell you what I like about Vacatello.
It is exactly that she is *not*, as you say, student-like. Bozhanov and Vacatello are the only two finalists who (for me) have assimilated their schooling and leaped into the great liberating realm beyond training, carrying awesome techniques with them. They combine ferocious chops with independent thinking. (Bozhanov especially.)
Vacatello has better hardware than Son or Wu. Tsujii has been a mixed bag for me — his best moment has been the op116. It’s impressive for anyone to play Chopin op10, but otherwise his reading left me uninterested. In fact, those etudes struck me as student-like, albeit an excellent and promising student! In Hoachen I see an exceptionally trained young man who is some years away from making the leap to pure music-making.
There’s a long way to go, but right now I need Bozhanov and Vacatello to take away medals. I don’t feel that need with the others.
June 4th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
Saying that Beethoven #2 is not a favorite is nothing new. That’s like saying Beethoven #1, #3 or Mendelssohn #1 or Schumann is not a favorite.
Most people’s favorites are the usual suspects: Tchaik, Rach, etc …
June 4th, 2009 at 3:33 pm
You asked: If Zimerman were here……..he’d have averted his eyes and enjoyed the performance. That or he would have fainted.
June 4th, 2009 at 4:12 pm
@Cliburn lover: To see what you might have been missing up to now, did you just see that Prokofiev rehearsal with Vacatello? Even when she was saving energy, it was so perfect it was scary. Mercurial and brilliant. Total coordination with conductor and orchestra. I haven’t heard it this good in a long, long time. Her earlier performances are different in the imagination category than Bozhanov’s, for example, but she’s an excellent pianist, mature musician, and is writing the book on consistency. That’s one of the big qualities the jury is looking for.
June 4th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
Mike,
Thank you so much for your comments on Bozhanov’s Chopin concert. I agree and understand exactly what you said. Yes, it is exceptional performance of this piece and beautiful. I love it.
June 4th, 2009 at 4:48 pm
I will have to trust your opinions people, because I cant pay $140 for a ticket…I will listen at home in the comfort of my living room
June 5th, 2009 at 4:23 am
It’s amazing, I loved all performances. The one that gave me goose bumps was that of Bozhanov. I don’t know about the tempo - some say it’s too fast, but he was so convincing! There’s great power, huge emotion and excuisite musicianship in this young man.